On a recent job, Mark Ancona, vice president of Cocoa, Fla.-based general contractor Sunrise Systems of Brevard Inc., got the kind of phone call contractors dread—bad news compounded by worse news.
"My superintendent informed me that all of the window frames had been pried out of an apartment building we were in the process of demolishing, and the walls had been ripped open so copper pipes and wires could be cut out," Ancona recalls. "The thieves didn’t bother to turn off the main, so water flowed out of the structure like a river for most of the weekend. On top of the lost revenue, we had to arm wrestle with the county over the bill for 170,000 gallons of water we ‘used’ during demolition."
Vandalism and theft have always threatened demolition job sites, however, the recent boom market for nonferrous scrap has dramatically increased the incidence of theft, according to Ancona. Furthermore, even as the demolition industry itself is growing more sophisticated, so are the thieves targeting the industry’s valuable scrap. "As prices went up, more and more materials started to disappear," says Drew Lammers, president of the National Demolition Association, Doylestown, Pa., and former president of a demolition contracting firm in Ohio. "[Thieves] will also spend more time getting every pound of copper they possibly can."
Like Ancona’s story illustrates, the bad news is that materials theft is on the rise at demolition sites. What Ancona and his colleagues are finding as worse news is that securing their sites against such theft isn’t always a cost-effective option.
ON THE RISECopper piping and wire have been popular targets for years and remain among the most commonly stolen items from demolition sites. "Copper piping and copper wiring is so valuable on a per pound basis thieves will walk right past a pile of aluminum sitting on the ground and proceed to pull copper out of the ground," says Steve Pece, owner of Pece of Mind, a demolition company based in Orlando.
However, high prices across nonferrous grades have expanded thieves’ targeted materials. "Thieves in Florida have gone as far as cutting down aluminum light poles and cutting coils out of operating air conditioning units," Ancona says. "They have stolen radiators out of vehicles and cut down power lines."
William Gumbiner, principal of Demolition Industry Consultants LLC, Noblesville, Ind., says other metals like stainless steel and brass are also targeted. More than traditional scrap metal is at risk, Gumbiner adds, saying that thieves are also targeting equipment, from gas powered saws to gas and oxygen gauges to skid-steer loaders. "If it has value, it will be stolen," Gumbiner says. "If a thief can carry copper wire, the equivalent of one bag of cement—90 pounds—the thief can realize a ‘profit’ of a minimum $200 cash," he continues. "If the thief can manage to steal a pick-up truck load of clean copper, he could realize a ‘profit’ of $3,000 cash. It is a case of risk vs. reward, and at today’s scrap prices, the reward appears to trump the risk of being caught."
Scrap has always had value in the eyes of demolition contractors, many of whom build in anticipated money from recovered materials into their bids for jobs. While thieves may assume that materials at the job site are bound for disposal, making their theft a supposed victimless crime, Ancona says that the loss from theft is definitely felt on the contractor’s bottom line. "Our estimated losses from theft during fiscal 2007 are running about $45,000," he says. "That’s $45,000 in lost profit, not lost revenue."
That kind of financial hit leaves a company hurting. Unfortunately, many contractors find their problems with theft compounded by the high cost of trying to secure their sites.
SECURITY AT WHAT COST?Contractors are typically responsible for their own security once a site is turned over to them. While this gives them autonomy to manage the site, many contractors are finding themselves caught in the middle of wanting to protect valuable salvage assets and having few cost-effective security methods available to them.
Fences are a fairly inexpensive means to add security, however, they are hardly impenetrable. "Unfortunately, if a thief wants to access a site or building, a fence is not going to stop them," says Steve Hosier, Veit Cos., Rogers, Minn.
Pete Charamut of Melbourne, Fla.-based Frank-Lin Excavating Inc., points to other problems with fences. "Fences help, but can create cover for the thief."
Pece has tried fencing and additional lighting as a means to ward off potential thieves and has seen little benefit from either method. "We personally have had no luck with fencing or lighting to solve the problem," he says. "Thieves today are so brazen they will cut fencing and even cut the power to the lighting so they can work in the dark."
More sophisticated means of surveillance like security cameras may add protection, but not without a great deal of added cost. "We’ve considered video surveillance, but it is a problematic solution at best. A camera system capable of recording decent images in reduced lighting is expensive," says Ancona.
Tim Maguire of Triple M Demolition in Brantford, Ontario, Canada, says that fences have also done little to protect his work sites. "The only real option is to have full time security," he says. Maguire says he’s put round-the-clock shifts at job sites, but has found the cost of the extra labor hours outweighs the gains of added security. "It’s an all-around losing prospect," he says.
Ancona agrees that many contractors are challenged by finding the balance between protecting valuable scrap and spending more than the material is worth. "On each job, there is a delta between the value of the recyclables and the costs associated with protecting them," he says.
One solution is to move scrap to a secure area for off site for processing as quickly as possible.
OFF-SITE SOLUTIONSCharamut says that he has tried to increase off site processing as a means to keep scrap away from thieves. "We bring anything valuable back to our
With high nonferrous prices and a depressed economy, demolition contractors are dealing with a sharp increase in theft from worksites in general, as well as a rise in theft by their own employees. In fact, industry consultant William Gumbiner, principal of Demolition Industry Consultants LLC, Noblesville, Ind., says this kind of internal theft happens more often than outside theft. "The misconception is the theft of scrap is being done by individuals who enter demolition sites after normal work hours, under the cover of darkness and steal scrap from the demolition contractor," Gumbiner says. "The fact is [a considerable amount] of scrap theft is done by demolition contractors’ employees, sub-contractors, general contractors (on-site) and their sub-contractors." Mark Ancona, vice president of Cocoa, Fla.-based general contractor Sunrise Systems of Brevard Inc., also says he has seen employee theft on the rise. "At $2.60 per pound for copper, an employee could see an extra couple hundred bucks a week just by filling up a lunch pail everyday," he says. Contractors have also seen an increase in employees aiding outside thieves, if not directly stealing themselves, says Drew Lammers, president of the National Demolition Association. He reports that one technique of employees with theft on their agendas is to stack material off to the side for thieves to take at a later time. When an employee is caught stealing, decisions about how to handle the situation can become murky, Ancona says. "Employees represent a significant investment, and you have to weigh that when making the decision to let someone go," he says. However, even with that in mind, prosecution sends one of the clearest messages to potential thieves, Ancona adds, even though the decision may be difficult. "If you identify a thief, even if it is a trusted employee, prosecute. The message has to get out that we are no longer willing to tolerate this activity." Gumbiner agrees, adding, "The most effective deterrent for demolition contractors’ employees is zero tolerance for employee theft."
yard and place it in containers so we can process it at a later date," he says.
Threats from Within
"It’s much safer to transport the materials to a secure facility and process them there with little fear of theft," Pece agrees.
Gumbiner also advises getting scrap material off site as quickly as possible. "The best way to limit scrap theft is to remove copper, brass, aluminum and stainless steel daily at the end of each day’s work shift and deliver it to the demolition contractor’s equipment storage yard or directly to a reputable recycler," he says.
Even when cooperating with demolition contractors, scrap recyclers often find themselves caught in the middle of the theft issue. "Scrap dealers are split on [preventing theft] without losing revenues from their legitimate customers. Everyone knows the copper stolen from my job today may well be sold to the same scrap dealer I was going to sell it to. But without serial numbers or other very unique ways to ID the scrap metal, it’s very hard for law enforcement to prosecute," he says.
Ancona says dealers in his area recognize the problem and want to be a part of the solution, but may find themselves in an awkward position. "Yard operators are generally willing to help, but must weigh their level of voluntary cooperation against the possibility of reduced revenues and loss of customer trust," he says.
The scrap business is relationship-based, making trust issues like accepting stolen materials all the more difficult to handle.
Scrap theft is also notoriously hard to prosecute, which puts law enforcement agencies at a disadvantage from the start, according to Gumbiner. "Unlike cars, scrap salvage is almost impossible to identify, and most stolen materials are sold within hours of the theft," he says. "The problem for legitimate scrap recyclers is again the inability of the recycler to identify the difference between stolen or legitimately owned salvage."
The difficulty can leave some contractors feeling ignored when they turn to local law enforcement following a theft. Triple M’s Maguire says he’s had little luck with law enforcement following up on theft reports, which puts the onus of dealing with the loss and preventing further incidents fully on him and his staff. Maguire sees theft, much as many in the industry see rising transportation and utility costs, increasingly as a cost of doing business. "It’s a sad, sad thing," he says. "I can’t see it getting any better."
While the scenario seems bleak, contractors can take steps to secure their material that don’t require costly security equipment.
SEEKING HELPThe relationship-based nature of the business is part of the problem of scrap theft, but it can also contribute to theft prevention, Ancona says. He has found approaching neighboring property owners and law enforcement has been helpful.
Ancona says in his experience, investing some extra time and effort when it comes to job site neighbors can pay off in the long run. "You walk that track hoe over or you help them clear a ditch, now you’ve got a friend forever," he says. "Now he’s going to keep an eye on your stuff." He also recommends approaching local law enforcement agencies. "We notify local law enforcement of our presence in the neighborhood. If you approach them with a positive, pro-active agenda, often times they will step up patrols in the area," he says.
Numerous state and local legislative bodies have approved or are considering bills that address scrap metal theft. Gumbiner says he sees legislative action as one of the best ways to combat the problem. "The only way to stop the theft of high value salvage materials…is to enact state laws that would tighten requirements for recyclers to only accept high value scrap from individuals who produce valid photo ID and [to] pay only by check, not debit cards or in most cases untraceable cash," he says.
Hosier says such efforts are underway in his home state of Minnesota. "The city of Minneapolis and the state of Minnesota are currently working on ways to further regulate scrap dealers and their material acceptance policies. It is virtually impossible for a contractor to dictate to a scrap dealer how they should run their business," he says. "We fully support tougher material acceptance standards such as detailed chain of custody records, but in the end, we can only follow the lead of entities in a position to regulate the scrap industry."
Lammers points out that like fences and cameras, even the strictest legislation might not be enough to deter determined thieves so long as nonferrous prices are high. "It’s risk vs. reward," he says, adding that as long as the potential reward outweighs the risk, the industry will remain prone to theft.
Ancona says it will take cooperation on many fronts to decrease the incidence of theft. "As a demolition contractor, we absolutely depend on cash from salvage to remain competitive," he says. "Unfortunately, there are no easy answers. With continued cooperation between local contractors, recyclers and law enforcement, hopefully we can realize a reduction in job site theft and more prosecution of metal thieves." C&DR
The author is associate editor of Construction & Demolition Recycling and can be contacted at jgubeno@gie.net.
Explore the April 2008 Issue
Check out more from this issue and find your next story to read.
Latest from Construction & Demolition Recycling
- Ferrous market ends 2024 in familiar rut
- NDA to offer certification test at convention
- Hyster-Yale commits to US production
- World Cement Association highlights challenges facing long-term cement demand
- Tata Steel to supply equipment maker JCB
- Light House embarks on construction site plastic scrap recycling effort
- NDA accepting nominations for safety awards
- Jackson Demolition wins safety award